This is a photo of Christopher Hubbard Photo

Chris is a skilled advocate and litigation strategist who helps clients solve complex and high-stakes disputes.

Chris is a partner in our Litigation Group. He maintains a general litigation practice with a focus on complex commercial disputes and professional negligence. As a skilled advocate and litigation strategist, he is sought out by clients from diverse industries to solve complex and high stakes disputes. 

" Chris, we have used consistently for litigation matters over a number of years, for a number of complex, high-profile cases and we’ve had consistently exceptional service from him. He’s very smart, very capable, very cost-effective, understands our business, understands our pain points, if you will, and just generally an exceptional individual to work with. "
Client Nomination

Chris is the Consumer Products Sector Lead of our National Retail and Consumer Markets Group. He works closely with consumer products companies and retailers to provide practical and actionable advice, bringing a strategic approach to product liability matters, product recalls, and commercial contract and related insurance disputes.

He is also a member of our National Class Actions Group, a past Vice-Chair of the Class and Derivative Actions sub-committee of the American Bar Association, and a past Co-Chair of our National Mining Litigation Group. He is the co-author of the Product Liability and Regulatory Compliance Chapters of our Retail and Consumer Products guides to doing business in Canada; a contributing author of Defending Class Actions: A Guide for Defendants; and a past contributing author of the Class Actions Chapter of the ABA’s Business and Corporate Litigation Committee’s Annual Review.

Chris’ commercial litigation practice includes assisting clients with a variety of litigation and regulatory issues, including product liability claims, class proceedings, product recalls, commercial contract disputes, and insurance coverage disputes on behalf of policy holders (including for COVID-19 related loss). His clients include food and consumer products companies, national and international retailers, automakers, mining companies, constructions companies, and consulting firms.

Chris’ expertise in class actions, insurance, and health law is particularly valuable to businesses faced with COVID-19 related risk. He has extensive trial and appellate experience defending health-related claims, whether brought on an individual basis or as a putative class action. He works with an extensive network of leading medical experts, such as experts in infectious diseases, which are critical to defending health-related claims based on exposure to infectious diseases such as COVID-19.

Chris also has extensive experience assisting clients with professional liability claims. Chris acts for physicians on behalf of the Canadian Medical Protective Association. He also acts for professional accounting and consulting firms. Chris defends professionals at civil trials and appeals, and administrative proceedings.

REPRESENTATIVE CASES – COMMERCIAL 

  • Insurance Claims for COVID-19 Business Interruption Loss – Counsel for numerous companies and professionals pursuing insurance claims for COVID-19 related business interruption and other losses.
  • Carillion City of Toronto et al. – Counsel for Carillion in complex dispute involving 44 legal actions related to a $170 million claim against the City of Toronto and its consultant arising from the Union Station revitalization project, and related insurance claim.
  • In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Guo Li Chun – Counsel for Barclays Bank, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs in successful application to enforce USD$324 million debt. Leading Court of Appeal decision regarding partial lift of automatic stay pending appeal.
  • Kathleen Carroll-Byrne et al. Airbus S.A.S. et al. – Counsel for Airbus in class action for damages allegedly arising from the crash of Air Canada Flight 624 at the Halifax International Airport. Successful motion for production of cockpit voice record, upheld by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.
  • Alzu et al. Smucker Foods of Canada Corp. et al. – Counsel for Smucker Foods in putative national product liability class action seeking $25 million for alleged E. coli contamination of flour. Counsel for defendant regarding related Health Canada regulatory proceeding, national product recall, and commercial contract, indemnification and insurance disputes. 
  • Yvonne Morris Unilever Canada Inc. et al. – Counsel for Unilever in putative national product liability class action seeking damages for personal injury allegedly arising as a result of exposure to DMDM hydantoin.
  • Johnson et al. v. BMW of North America, BMW Canada Inc. et al. – Counsel for BMW in putative national product liability class action seeking $120 million for alleged product defect, Competition Act and conspiracy claims regarding the use of “defeat devices” in high performance automobiles.
  • McCann v. CP Ships – Counsel for CP Ships in cross-border securities class action. Successful opposition to plaintiff’s motion to assert jurisdiction over non-resident/non-U.S. claims of Canadian class members.
  • Smith v. National Money Mart Company – Counsel for Money Mart in class actions commenced in multiple provinces for damages allegedly arising from fees charged in connection with “pay-day loans”. Trial counsel during one of Canada’s first common law common issues trials. Successful settlement of claims and implementation and administration of settlements in Ontario, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.
  • Banerjee v. Shire Biochem Inc. et al. – Counsel for Draxis Health in product liability class action against manufacturer and distributor of Parkinson’s drug Permax.
  • Lilleyman v. Starkist Company et al. – Counsel for defendant in putative national price fixing class action seeking $275 million for alleged conspiracy and breach of the Competition Act.
  • Central Sun Mining Inc.Vector Engineering Inc. – Trial counsel to Central Sun Mining in successful action against various engineering firms for damages arising from the cessation of operations following a landslide at a gold mine in Costa Rica. Successful opposition to defence motions to stay or dismiss action on jurisdictional grounds, and to bifurcate and direct early adjudication of successor liability issue. Successful motion requiring the defendant’s corporate representative to re-attend for continued examination, and awarding substantial indemnity costs as a result of the defendant’s “reprehensible misconduct” in the litigation.
  • CGI Information Systems and Management Consultants Inc. v. eHealth Ontario – Counsel for CGI in multi-million dollar, high profile contract dispute.
  • Inforica Inc. v. CGI Information Systems and Management Consultants Inc. – Counsel to CGI in $14.4 million arbitration claim for breach of contract. Successful motion for security for costs in the amount of $750,000. Successful appeal to Court of Appeal confirming arbitrator’s order for security for costs. Leading Court of Appeal decision regarding the primacy of arbitration and jurisdiction of the Court to review arbitral awards.
  • Incorporated Broadcasters Limited et al. v. CanWest Global Communications Corp. et al. – Counsel to CanWest Global in successful summary judgment motion dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty, and plaintiffs’ oppression claim against a director and officer of the corporate defendants.
  • Celanese Canada Inc. v. Canadian National Railway Co. – Trial and appellate counsel for Celanese Canada in successful claim for property damage and business interruption loss arising from negligence in relation to the siding of rail cars.
  • Canadian Maritime Engineering v. Intact Insurance – Counsel for Canadian Maritime Engineering in successful application for a declaration permitting insured to appoint and instruct its own legal counsel to defend third party claim, and requiring insurer to pay all related defence costs.

REPRESENTATIVE CASES – PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE

  • Salter v. Hirst – Trial and appellate counsel for defendant physician in multi-million dollar claim for damages related to medical complications arising from aortic dissection. Successful defence of all allegations following long jury trial. Successful defence of trial decision at Court of Appeal. Leading decision regarding jurisdiction of trial judge to overturn jury verdict.
  • Hirchberg v. Doherty et al. – Counsel for defendant physicians in medical malpractice claim for damages allegedly arising from the use of Dexamethasone. Successful motion for summary judgment dismissing all allegations, and defence of dismissal at Court of Appeal.
  • Salisbury v. Kraft – Counsel for defendant physician in medical malpractice claim for damages allegedly arising from strabismus repair surgery. Successful motion for summary judgment dismissing all allegations.
  • Achneepineskum v. Laine – Trial and appellate counsel for defendant physician in multi-million dollar claim for damages related to medical complications arising from in utero hypoxic-ischemic event. Successful defence of all allegations following long trial. Successful defence of trial decision at Court of Appeal.
  • Whiteman v. Iamkhong et al. – Counsel for defendant physician in multi-million dollar claim for damages related to HIV infection. Successful defence of all allegations following three day summary judgment motion. Leading decision regarding duty of care owed by physician to third parties. Successful defence of summary judgment decision at Court of Appeal.
  • Surujdeo v. Melady et al. – Counsel for defendants at trial and in Court of Appeal decision confirming the appropriate form of causation question to be put to a jury in a negligence action, and the jurisdiction of a trial judge to poll a jury in a civil action.
  • Rose v. Pettle et al. – Counsel to defendant physician/medical director in class action alleging negligent supervision in relation to outbreak of mycobacterium abscessus. Successful defence and settlement of action without payment on behalf of client.
  • Castle et al. v. Dawson – Trial counsel for defendant physician in claim for damages related to HIV infection. Successful defence of all allegations at trial.
  • Ryabikhina et al. v. Leong et al. – Successful defence at Court of Appeal of summary judgment motions dismissing negligence claims against defendant physicians. Successful application declaring plaintiffs vexatious litigants and prohibiting plaintiffs from commencing or continuing further litigation without leave of the Court.
  • Ramnanan v. Drake – Counsel for defendant physicians in multi-million dollar claim for damages related to medical complications arising from pediatric neuro-surgery. Successful motion for summary judgment dismissing all allegations.