Is "Prejudice" in Security for Costs Only One Factor to Consider?

The Alberta Court of Appeal's decision, denying leave to appeal in Autoweld Systems Ltd. v. CRC-Evans Pipeline International Inc., provides authority for maintaining a security for costs order against a company with few assets. This decision will prove a useful authority to clients wishing to stop litigation where the plaintiff is a party unable to pay a costs award.

The Applicant, Autoweld Systems Limited, sought leave to appeal a security for costs order made by the case management judge in favour of the respondents CRC-Evans Pipeline International Inc., CRC-Evans Automatic Welding Inc., Malcom Timothy Carey and Richard Lee Jones.

Autoweld argued that the security for costs order would unduly prejudice its ability to prosecute its claim. Autoweld has a registered office in England, no assets or business in Alberta, and modest net assets of £23,827. Autoweld brought their suit against the Respondents for approximately $11,000,000 related to a settlement in a previous lawsuit. After the respondents unsuccessfully sought to stay the action, they were granted security for costs.

The Court is able to grant security for costs where it appears that a plaintiff will be unable to pay the costs of the successful defendant. In particular, the Rules of Court provide that the Court should consider (among any other relevant material):

  • whether it is likely the applicant for an order will be able to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta;
  • whether the respondent is likely to be able to pay a costs award;
  • the merits of the action; and
  • whether the security for costs order would unduly prejudice the respondent’s ability to continue the action.

Autoweld’s counsel argued that the prejudice of a security for costs order could be inferred from an abbreviated financial statement showing that the net assets of Autoweld were £23,827, and a Dun & Bradstreet Report assessing the risk of the plaintiff’s business failing as greater than average, and recommending that no more than £47,000 of credit be extended.

Decision

The Court of Appeal determined that the financial statement and the Dun & Bradstreet report were not sufficient evidence of prejudice, writing: “…conspicuous by its absence was any evidence that the applicant could not raise the funds required to satisfy the security for costs order.” Further, the Court wrote “[n]or am I prepared to infer undue prejudice from the evidence which the respondents adduced in order to show that there was some question about the applicant’s ability to pay a costs award […] More evidence would be required to demonstrate undue prejudice.”

Even more interesting, in dismissing the application for leave to appeal, Justice O’Ferrall wrote that:

[w]ith respect to the argument that the appeal raises a serious question of general importance, namely whether security for costs which unduly prejudices a plaintiff may be ordered, this could be an important question in a case where undue prejudice was established. Having said that, prejudice to a plaintiff’s ability to prosecute its claim is only one of a number of factors which must be considered; and given the direction of the Legislature contained in […] the Business Corporations Act, it may be that security for costs can be ordered in an amount which has the effect of preventing a claim from being prosecuted. [Emphasis mine.]

Significance

In short, this authority is a powerful weapon for companies looking to short-circuit claims where a plaintiff is unable to furnish security for costs. If prejudice is only one factor to consider in granting security for costs, it seems that security for costs in a “prejudicial” amount may be granted where the other factors are in favour of such an award.

Case Information

Autoweld Systems Ltd. v. CRC-Evans Pipeline International Inc., 2011 ABCA 243

Date of Decision:  August 8, 2011

Alberta Court of Appeal appeal assets Costs costs award financial statement prejudice security for costs

Authors

Subscribe

Stay Connected

Get the latest posts from this blog

Please enter a valid email address