Lawyer Profile Detail
David M. Porter
AREA OF EXPERTISE
University of Toronto
David Porter is the head of the firm’s White Collar Defence and Investigations practice, which is ranked in the Chambers Canada Guide as Band 1. Mr. Porter is given a personal Chambers Band 1 ranking for his white collar defence and investigations practice and is described in the Chambers ranking as “at the top of the list as an individual” for his work in the white collar defence area and is described as “a very dedicated, meticulous and organized lawyer”. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.
Mr. Porter has appeared as counsel on numerous criminal trials in the Superior Court of Justice and appeals in criminal matters in the Ontario Court of Appeal. He has acted for the Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario) in the Supreme Court of Canada. He has also been engaged in both prosecuting and defending professionals before disciplinary tribunals. Mr. Porter has frequently appeared as trial and appellate counsel for self-regulating professional colleges in Ontario.
Since 2006, Mr. Porter has been recognized in Best Lawyers in Canada as a leading practitioner in criminal defence. In 2016, he was recognized by Benchmark Canada as the White Collar/Enforcement/Constitutional litigator of the year. He also appears in the 2016 edition of the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory as a leading lawyer in the area of medical negligence.
He has been recognized as an international leader in the defence of white collar criminal cases in the International Who’s Who of Business Crime Defence Lawyers 2010, and in the Who’s Who Legal Directory for 2010 in the list of outstanding counsel in the area of business crime defence. Since 2014 he has been recognized in the International Who’s Who of Investigations Lawyers, which has stated that “his abilities in the sector are internationally renowned.” He is also recognized in the most recent edition of Who’s Who Legal: Canada as a leading lawyer in the areas of business crime defence and investigations, and in the 2016 Guide to the World’s Leading White Collar Crime Lawyers.
Mr. Porter is a member of the National Executive of the Criminal Justice Subsection of the Canadian Bar Association, and sits as the Canadian Bar Association member on the “Steering Committee on Justice Efficiencies and Access to the Justice System”, a national committee of judges, Crown counsel and defence counsel. He is the Law Society of Upper Canada representative on the Ontario Judicial Council. He is the North American Regional Representative in the Criminal Law Section of the International Bar Association.
From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Porter was a member of the adjunct faculty of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law, where he taught trial advocacy, and he currently teaches the LLM course in Evidence at Osgoode Hall Law School.
Mr. Porter received his BA from Queen’s University, his MA from the University of Sussex and his LLB from the University of Toronto. Mr. Porter was called to the Ontario bar in 1983.
- Mr. Porter was recently successful in his defence of the former CEO of Nortel in a lengthy fraud prosecution. The acquittal is reported as R. v. Dunn 2013 ONSC 137. In the course of the prosecution, judgment was received from Boswell, J. on December 31, 2009 in R. v. Dunn (2009) 251 C.C.C. (3d) 384 ordering the Crown to make its database of Crown disclosure fully searchable for the defence. The decision is a leading authority on electronic disclosure of voluminous documentation in criminal cases.
- In 2009, Mr. Porter obtained a new trial for his client, following a Crown appeal, in Regina v. Stucky 2009 ONCA 151. This case was a lengthy and complex prosecution by the Competition Bureau formisleading advertising.
- On December 24, 2010 Mr. Porter received the judgment acquitting his client in Regina v. De Zen et al, 2010 ONCJ 630, a lengthy fraud prosecution in which his client, the former CFO of Royal Group Technologies Limited, was acquitted of two counts of fraud.
- Mr. Porter was the lead author of “The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli” (2012), 58 The Criminal Law Quarterly, p.510.
- Mr. Porter frequently participates in numerous continuing education programs dealing with criminal law and professional discipline proceedings. Recently he sat on a L’Expert panel in Toronto to discuss the public corporation's response to a police investigation of the alleged corruption of a foreign public official.
- R. v. Nestle Canada Inc.: Settlement Privilege in Criminal Proceedings (May 11, 2015)
- R. v. Dunn, Beatty and Gollogly 2013 ONSC 137 – The Canadian Nortel Fraud Prosecution Results in Acquittals 6, IBA Criminal Law Section News, No. 1, March 2013, pp. 7-11
- Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in the Computer Age: A Brief Review of Regina v. Ward 2012 ONCA 660 and Regina v. Cole 2012 S.C.C. 53 (January 29, 2013)
- The Significance of Police Misconduct, and Misleading Testimony in the Analysis of the Seriousness of Charter Breaches: An Update (January 29, 2013)
R. v. Nestle Canada Inc.: Settlement Privilege in Criminal Proceedings
R. v. Dunn, Beatty and Gollogly 2013 ONSC 137 – The Canadian Nortel Fraud Prosecution Results in Acquittals
The Significance of Police Misconduct, and Misleading Testimony in the Analysis of the Seriousness of Charter Breaches: An Update
Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in the Computer Age: A Brief Review of Regina v. Ward 2012 ONCA 660 and Regina v. Cole 2012 S.C.C. 53
Anti-Bribery and Corruption Compliance: Coping With the Onslaught
Transactions & Cases