Profil d'un avocat
Daniel G.C. Glover
CHAMP DE COMPÉTENCE
Cybersécurité, confidentialité et gestion des données
Droit de la propriété intellectuelle
Franchises et distribution
Litige en propriété intellectuelle
Protection des renseignements personnels
FACULTÉ DE DROIT
Université de Toronto
ADMISSION AU BARREAU
Cette biographie est disponible en anglais seulement.
Daniel Glover is a partner in our Intellectual Property Group and a member of our Privacy, Technology, Consumer Products & Retail Group, Franchise & Distribution, and Appellate Groups.
Daniel has significant experience in all aspects of information and media law, including copyright and trade-mark protection, privacy, anti-spam and marketing compliance, the law of confidential information, and Internet law. He has advised numerous clients in the technology, consumer products, retail, financial services, and health services fields on privacy and anti-spam compliance issues, including with respect to compliance with CASL and the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules, in reaction to data breaches, and with domestic and international obligations attaching to the storage of information in the cloud.
In his litigation practice, Daniel delivered oral submissions on behalf of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), Music Canada, the Canadian Publishers’ Council and other creative industry stakeholders in the landmark decision of Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., 2017 SCC 73, a case that has drawn global attention, as it created a new form of equitable relief allowing courts to order search engines to remove links to infringing content worldwide and across all of their platforms. This case has been reported in Fortune, Wired, The New York Times, and the Hollywood Reporter, among other publications.
Daniel has also represented clients in numerous other complex intellectual property and privacy matters before the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, the British Columbia Court of Appeal, the Ontario Court of Appeal, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Copyright Board of Canada, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, and the Trade-marks Opposition Board.
Beyond his successful representation in the Equustek case, Daniel was counsel in successful appeals at the Supreme Court of Canada in two leading copyright cases in 2012, appeared at the Supreme Court again in 2013 and 2015 in important appeals on the test for copyright infringement and the application of copyright law to new technologies. Lexpert has named five of his cases in its annual “Top 10 cases” rankings (for 2012, 2014, 2015 and 2017), and another was named a Managing IP Milestone Case of the Year for 2016. Daniel also led the drafting of an amicus brief on international copyright law standards at the Supreme Court of the United States in 2014.
A selection of cases in which Daniel was counsel includes:
- American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et al. v. Aereo, Inc., fka Bamboom Labs, Inc, 134 S. Ct. 2498 (Supreme Court of the United States, 2014)
- Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google Inc., 2017 SCC 73 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- Cinar Corporation v. Robinson, 2013 SCC 73 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010‑167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010‑168, 2012 SCC 68 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- ESA v. SOCAN, 2012 SCC 34 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- Alberta v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency, 2012 SCC 37 (Supreme Court of Canada)
- National Football League et al. v. Attorney-General of Canada, 2017 FCA 249 (leave to appeal pending)
- Sirius Canada Inc. v. CMRRA/SODRAC Inc. 2010 FCA 348 (Federal Court of Appeal)
- Maple Leaf Foods Inc. v. Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma, 2010 FCA 247 (Federal Court of Appeal)
- Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Assn. v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada, 2008 FCA 6 (Federal Court of Appeal)
- Columbia Pictures Industries v. Wang, 2007 SKCA 133 (Sask. C.A.)
- CEG License Inc. v. Joey Tomato’s (Canada) Inc., 2012 FC 1541 (Federal Court)
- Matol Biotech Laboratories Ltd. v. Jurak Holdings Ltd., 2008 FC 1082 (Federal Court)
- Robertson v. Proquest Learning and Information LLC, 2010 CanLII 31314 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice)
- Omega SA v. Iwatsu Electric Co. (2011), 95 C.P.R. (4th) 78 (T.M.O.B.)
- Certiwood Technical Centre v Cedar Shake & Shingle Bureau, 2012 TMOB 207
The client base of Daniel includes well-known media companies and industry organizations (in the film, television, music, gaming, and publishing sectors), major retailers and consumer products manufacturers, telecommunication providers and content hosts, sports leagues, automakers, banks, insurers and financial services companies, health services providers, and software, electronics and technology manufacturers.
Daniel was named in the enforcement and litigation category in the World Trademark Review 1000 for 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 with one firm client stating that he “is just brilliant. He is very very sharp and is exceptionally conscientious, smart, courteous and very funny too”. His contributions were also cited by IP Stars in naming McCarthy Tétrault as a Tier One copyright firm in Canada for 2017.
Daniel is an adjunct professor in intellectual property law at the Osgoode Hall Law School at York University and a co-author of the texts Intellectual Property Law in Canada: Cases and Commentary (Carswell), Global Privacy and Security Law Reference (Aspen Publishers), and the User's Guide to Canadian Copyright Tariffs (McCarthy Tétrault). He was called upon to testify as an expert on the operations of the Copyright Board before the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, with his testimony singled out in the Committee’s subsequent report.
Daniel is past chair of the Copyright Policy Committee of the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada (IPIC), sat on the Canadian Working Committee for the Association Internationale Pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (AIPPI), and is a member of the International Trademark Association (INTA) and the Association Littéraire & Artistique Internationale (ALAI). He has presented on intellectual property issues at numerous conferences, including for Insight, the Ontario Bar Association, the Law Society of Upper Canada, and the 40th annual conference of the Canadian Conference on International Law on intellectual property and the Internet.
Daniel clerked at the Court of Appeal for Ontario. He received his JD (Honours) from the University of Toronto, where he concentrated on intellectual property and won the Gowlings Prize in Law and Information Technology, the Honourable Jerry S. Grafstein, QC Prize in Communications Law, the A. Alan Borovoy Prize in Civil Liberties, the Patricia Julia Myhal Scholarship in Legal Writing, and the Lang Michener Prize in Property.
Prior to entering law school, Daniel was an editor and writer for the National Post and an editor for the Frommer’s and Let’s Go travel guide series.
Daniel received his MA from the University of Toronto in 1996 and his AB (magna cum laude) from Harvard University in 1994, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and won numerous awards, including the Thomas T. Hoopes Prize, the LeBaron Russell Briggs Traveling Fellowship and the John Harvard Scholarship. He was called to the Ontario bar in 2006 and is a registered trade-mark agent.
Importantes décisions en droit bancaire de 2016 : La Cour suprême du Canada rend sa décision dans Banque Royale du Canada c. Trang
Publication de la deuxième édition du User’s Guide to Canadian Copyright Tariffs
La Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels numériques entre en vigueur
La CSC invalide la loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels de l’Alberta pour des motifs de liberté d’expression
À l’instar d’autres provinces, le Manitoba adopte sa propre législation en matière de protection des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé
La Cour d'appel fédérale statue sur le brevet « en un seul clic » d'Amazon.com — Les pratiques commerciales demeurent brevetables au Canada
Intellectual Property and the Internet
Décision marquante pour les propriétaires de marque — La Cour suprême du Canada facilite la protection de votre marque de commerce!
La Cour d’appel fédérale confirme le tarif homologué par la Commission du droit d’auteur dans le secteur de l’enseignement
La Cour d’appel fédérale rejette les demandes de contrôle judiciaire du Tarif 22.A
Transactions et causes
La Cour suprême du Canada confirme qu’il est possible d’ordonner aux intermédiaires Internet de désindexer les sites illégaux à l’échelle mondiale: Google Inc. c. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 CSC 34
Droit d’auteur et télévision par Internet : Bell Média gagne sa cause
La Cour suprême du Canada rejette le régime de « taxe TV » proposé par le CRTC.
Echo Bridge Entertainment LLC fait l'acquisition d'Alliance Atlantis International Distribution Limited auprès de Goldman Sachs